My previous post discussed a more formal and “mainstream-compatible” paper on structured oscillatory fields, multipole geometry, and emergent interaction scales.
This new note goes in the opposite direction: radically simplified semi-classical reasoning using only rotating charge, Maxwellian current geometry, coupled oscillations, and elementary rotational dynamics.
Oddly enough, both approaches seem to converge toward similar intuitions about oscillatory structure and geometry in physics.
Perhaps progress sometimes comes not from moving in a straight line, but from oscillating between abstraction and simplicity.
Paper:
“A Minimal Rotational Model of the Proton”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/405058923_A_Minimal_Rotational_Model_of_the_Proton
Reading Feynman 
Possible Iímplications for proton-boron fusion research?
Interesting question. I assume you mean proton–boron (hydrogen–boron) fusion reactions.
I am not a fusion specialist, so I would be cautious about making direct technological claims. My work is presently much more modest and foundational: trying to understand whether stable particle structure itself may be interpretable in terms of constrained oscillatory charge-field geometry.
That said, if rotational/oscillatory structure really matters at the proton level, then one could imagine that:
phase relationships,
geometrical coupling,
or oscillatory synchronization effects
might eventually play some role in how we think about nuclear interaction or fusion dynamics.
But that is speculative territory for now. The present paper should primarily be read as a phenomenological and geometrical exploration of proton structure itself, not as a fusion-engineering proposal.
Agreed. But maybe someone someday will fuse your insights about the proton structure with fusion engeering!